The Gods’ colour (or on the black Heimdall)

There’s some debate on the upcoming Thor movie. Of course, it’s a cinematic rendering of the Marvel comics’ character, but some in the heathen world as well as white supremacists are shocked at the news that the god Heimdall will be played by a black actor. On December, Jason posted about the issue in his Wild Hunt blog and new comments are still popping up occasionally. And all the while I find myself wondering how easily people assume religion is a stiff, fossilized thing, governed by unrealistic notions of purity.

Yes, it is somewhat shocking to see Heimdall as a black figure, especially since Snorri calls Him hvíti áss, the white god. But it’s shocking to me only in the sense that it is unexpected, a new way of depicting this enigmatic Norse deity. Because, truth be told, representations of any god have been as diverse as the cultures and ages that pay them homage; sometimes even radically so and occasionally in the same country at the same time.

A good example of it is the bodhisattva Avalokitesvara, a popular deity-like figure in Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism and even in some places where the Theravada tradition is dominant. The exact history of His origin is uncertain, but it is probably Indian. What is known is that this particular deity gained worship anywhere Mahayana Buddhism reached and in very different forms: in Tibet, He’s also known as Chenrezig and the Dalai Lamas have been considered a reincarnation of Avalokitesvara for centuries; in China His name was translated as Guanyin and took both the female and male form. Yes, both sexes! She’s Cundi and Kuan Yin, a very popular Goddess of Compassion; but in Japan, He’s Kannon. This is what happens when different cultures take on the same god.

The same can be told of other deities. The Persian Mithras had a mystery cult in the Roman world that appears to be unheard of in His native Persia, and Isis, though originally Egyptian, once in Rome came to be depicted in a more classical fashion, more to the Roman liking (see here, for instance). In Gandhara, Graeco-Buddhist art depicted the bodhisattva Vajrapani as Hercules, club and everything (see here, for instance). Even the Abrahamic god is both undepicted and depicted: Jews and Muslims refuse to reduce Him to the forms of human art, but Catholics have historically done it for centuries, be it on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, in this equally bearded Spanish version, or as the medieval hand stretching out from the heavens. And in modern Japan, the popular kami Inari is depicted as a woman, a man, or a fox in both Shinto and Buddhist contexts.

I’m aware, of course, that none of this ever happened to the Norse Gods. Not that there are many surviving pre-Christian depictions of Them with colours, but I’m willing to concede that, in the old days, They were represented with the physical traits of Their worshippers: light skin and blonde, black, or red-haired (the latter being the case of Thor). But what those same modern heathens fail to consider is why. Why were the Norse Gods depicted like the Norse people and never in a “foreign” way? Is it because They demanded to be represented in that fashion or, on the contrary, because no Asian, Northern African, or even Southern European is known to have worshipped Them? And did that happen because there was a sense of “racial loyalty” or because the Norse were so up north that they never entered the cultural melting pot that was the Mediterranean and the Eastern Hellenist kingdoms? Perhaps we should look at the Rhine and Danube regions and see how Germanic deities were depicted in a Roman fashion; like the Matronae, for instance, possibly linked to the Disir. And if this happened in an area of contact between the Germanic and Latin worlds, what would have happened if Scandinavia had been in close contact with African cultures to the point of exchanging religious practices?

In the end, the Gods naturally assume the forms (and often norms) of the cultures that embrace Them, sometimes taking on looks that may be unfamiliar to other worshippers of Theirs. If historically that never happened with the Norse Gods, that has more to do with the geographical and relatively isolated position of the European far north than with any notion of racial, ethnic, or religious purity. Religion is both tradition and fluidity; it has stable elements, but it also has changeable parts and art is one of them. So in a world that has become a small village, where people of colour are naturally present in societies that used to be almost exclusively white, why shouldn’t Heimdall be depicted as black? He may be an unlikely choice, but that doesn’t justify the uproar.

5 thoughts on “The Gods’ colour (or on the black Heimdall)

  1. It’s funny you mention cultural influence on our Gods. Myself, rather than seeing Thor as He is described in lore, as a red-haired God, I see Him as blonde. I’ve considered this for awhile; most of the renderings of Him I’ve seen since childhood have been through the Marvel filter, and any non-Marvel filter has been in black and white. I think that people seeing the Gods in forms different from what they historically have been depicted as is fine with me, so long as they recognize that their understanding of their God may not entirely jive with lore. I certainly recognize my UPGs may not, and for almost any time I’ve see this, it’s a good thing, and the departure from lore isn’t grievous.

    • If I’m not mistaken, Thor’s “redness” referred to His fiery nature, as in that moment in Þrymskviða where Þrym takes a look at the Thunderer’s eyes. Of course, such detail could easily be missed by the people at Marvel and that originated a more Arian image of Thor. Nothing wrong with that per se: the Gods’ images change for many reasons, sometimes conflictingly so and perhaps Inari’s identification with the fox in today’s Japan is the best example of it in a polytheistic context. Or maybe the representations of the Egyptian Khnum, Who started as a ram god with horns extended horizontally, as in a primitive species of sheep that later became extinct, leading at one point to Khnum’s depiction with “conventional” curled ram horns.

      People naturally depict the Gods with a mixture of the traditional and the reality of their own time.

      • Good point; I found a passage in a translation that you’re talking about:
        “”Why are so fearful | the eyes of Freyja?
        Fire, methinks, | from her eyes burns forth.”

        I think that it is one of the strengths of Paganism in that we can have different iconographies, illustrations, or just outright vies of our Gods, and still all be talking about/to the same God/dess. I never thought about the example of Khnum, though, so I’ll have to look into that.

        Thank you; you’re consistently giving out excellent food for thought.

      • Yes, polydoxy can be very common among pagans and polytheists, though I have met several who simply poured multiple gods into a monotheistic mindset and ended up having the same notions of single doctrine and practices Christians or Muslims do. Some of those people are the same who cry havoc at the idea of a black Heimdall.

        And thank you!

  2. To me, it is a pity when that happens because it in many ways denies the uniqueness of the Gods while squishing them into places They may not fit, either by Their history/myth as a God/dess, or by dint of how They work within Their pantheon/group/tribe.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s