Enumerating and analysing all of them would be excessive for a blog, but because I wanted to make known some of the gods and goddess of the land that became Portugal, I created a small list and reserved a more detailed look for a couple of handfuls of Iberian deities. All in a format that is hopefully accessible and at the same time historically solid, beyond the mere repetition of contents that proliferates online and is often – too often! – characterized by a complete absence of bibliographic references and an apparent attachment to a single scholar, usually Leite de Vasconcelos, as if nothing else has been written since. And also due to that, because a desire for instant information and speedy conclusions are too prone to generate a poor understanding of things, I though it wise to add to the list and analysis of Iberian deities the following explanation:
1. Present identities are not past ones
There’s a risk of anachronism when one speaks of Portuguese or Spanish gods, for the simple reason that Portugal and Spain, as political entities, date from several centuries after Classical and pre-Classical Antiquity. No Lusitanian, Calician or Turduli would have recognized him or herself in Portuguese nationality, because that’s a later construction. And the founding of Portugal, as that of Spain, had nothing inevitable about it, for which reason it is equally anachronic to speak of pre-Roman peoples as a kind of annunciation of what was to come. That is nothing more than a nationalistic fantasy that simply projects that present onto the past and looks at History as a providential thing. At best, one may speak of Portuguese and/or Spanish gods in reference to modern borders, though that allows for no more than a form of (re)settleting, a creation of new bounds with the land, including by way of new epithets. It is not a statement about the original or an intrinsic identity of those deities;
Precisely because yesterday’s identities are not today’s, the gods presented here, namely those who are the focus of a closer look, should not be seen as part of a single and coherent pantheon. Instead, they’re deities of communities and ethnic groups that inhabited what today is only part of Portuguese territory. And that means there are gods whose roles are similar or even identical, which may seem redundant, but was not so at the time, because we’re not talking about Portuguese gods – and therefore not of a single pantheon – but of the religious life of various communities and groups, different “countries” if you will, which were located in only part of what is now Portugal;
3. Ritual plurality
Generally speaking, there’s no exact record of how the old Iberian gods were worshipped. We lack traditional gestures or prayers and descriptions or even depictions of their symbols or sacred spaces. There’s only a very limited number of archaeological findings that reveal some of that information and, not without reason, it is assumed that at some point most Iberian deities were the focus of Roman or Romanized cults. The simple fact that the vast majority of native theonyms survive thanks to being carved on classical altars goes to show how much indigenous religions traditions changed under the influence of Rome.
This partly answers to the question of how should the Iberian gods be worshipped today. Roman rite is a perfectly suitable option, given that it has a multisecular historical precedent, but there are other equally valid possibilities, starting with Celtic ritual formulas, to which some of the Iberian deities may have been native. There’s also the option of a mixed solution in the likes of a Gallo-Roman cult and one may also consider a modern ritual praxis, wiccan and neodrudic being two well-known examples. Because the same gods can be worshipped in different ways and, at the end of the day, which tradition to apply it something that ultimately depends on the type of agreement that has been struck between the deity and its worshippers;
4. Starting point, not the end of the matter
What’s written in these dozen or so pages about Iberian gods is not the full scope of the subject. Rather, it is an overview of current and past research, the various theories and hypothesis that have been put forward by different scholars, and which provides for a fuller and more historically solid view of the old Iberian gods. If you wish to know more, just follow the bibliographic references or do a search online for additional academic pieces. And in doing so, you may end reaching conclusion that are in some or many ways different from mine;
5. Doubt rules them all
That is so because what little there is is largely a collection of hypothesis and theories. The data is scant, highly fragmented and there’s no know traditions or myths with which one can complete the surviving information. At best, there’s a handful or less or classical accounts by authors who were foreign to pre-Roman Iberian cultures and whose words may therefore be skewed by cultural prejudice. And for many Iberian deities, the name and little else is all there is. Therefore, there is a huge leeway to formulate theories, not because anything goes – we’re not that deep in the dark! – but because doubt has the final word in a lot of issues;
6. Old roots, new branches
I already implied it, but the list of gods in this section of the menu is meant not only to share knowledge on old Iberian gods, but also the serves as a starting point for those who want to worship Them. Of course, doing so today means that you have to go beyond the historical information, not just because the modern context is very different from that of two thousand years ago, also due to the fact that the information is so scarce that, on its own, it doesn’t allow for the reconstruction of a functional religious system. Again, this doesn’t mean that anything goes, since there is nonetheless an historical starting point that should, at the very least, be taken into consideration. If nothing else because what little there is was produced by people who believed in and worshipped these gods, who nurtured relationships with Them, so that to simply cast aside their insight instead of trying to learn from it, is almost like a form of hubris. The past teaches us things and we would do well to learn from them if we’re taking things from the past.
So what does it mean to go beyond historical information, but without losing sight of it? It means that you should pick an interpretative theory formulated on the basis of known information – as opposed to inventing out of thin air or just because it “feels right” – and from there build a new cult with equally new elements, but which are not in contradiction with historical data. The scarcity of data and the modern context call for innovation if one is to have living and functional religions, but without simply throwing away the experiences and knowledge of those who came before us. Or to put it differently, one must be like an old tree, its roots buried deep in the past, but its branches stretching out into the sky and in constant growth. If a stump is all there is, because the past is all that matters, there’s nothing but a dead tree; if there’s only branches, because this is now and the past should be left behind, it’s not even a tree;
7. I speak for myself and myself alone
In that sense and with the exception of the page on the Lares Viales, which are a special case with particular traits, every closer look at individual Iberian gods is structured in a way that makes a clear distinction between the existing information, the theories that have been put forward, my work hypothesis and, based on it, my ideas for a modern cult. Let me stress that: my ideas! I’m not offering dogmas or commandments, just suggestions. And I have no stake in most of them, since I don’t most worship most of the gods listed here, not because I have anything against Them, but because each person has its preferences and mine include a limited group of Iberian deities. But as a matter of consistency and since my interests and not other people’s, I offer ideas for different cults – even those I don’t practice – delineating the work hypothesis they’re based on and distinguishing them from the historical information. It is the most honest and open way to do it and allows for those reading the texts to make their own conclusions, take it or leave it and, if you so wish, formulate your own hypothesis. If that results in cult and conception variations, so be it. Diversity is natural and it should be accepted as such;
8. Change is a constant part of life
One last thing: the information offered in this section of the menu may be updated or changed in case new information comes to light, especially if it changes my perspective. Again, I’m not offering dogmas, just ideas and work hypothesis that are naturally subject to the current conditions.
Having said that, enjoy your reading!
And should you decide to go from words to actions, may you have good experiences!